static cp_declarator *make_pointer_declarator
(cp_cv_quals, cp_declarator *);
static cp_declarator *make_reference_declarator
- (cp_cv_quals, cp_declarator *);
+ (cp_cv_quals, cp_declarator *, bool);
static cp_parameter_declarator *make_parameter_declarator
(cp_decl_specifier_seq *, cp_declarator *, tree);
static cp_declarator *make_ptrmem_declarator
/* Like make_pointer_declarator -- but for references. */
cp_declarator *
-make_reference_declarator (cp_cv_quals cv_qualifiers, cp_declarator *target)
+make_reference_declarator (cp_cv_quals cv_qualifiers, cp_declarator *target,
+ bool rvalue_ref)
{
cp_declarator *declarator;
declarator = make_declarator (cdk_reference);
declarator->declarator = target;
- declarator->u.pointer.qualifiers = cv_qualifiers;
- declarator->u.pointer.class_type = NULL_TREE;
+ declarator->u.reference.qualifiers = cv_qualifiers;
+ declarator->u.reference.rvalue_ref = rvalue_ref;
if (target)
{
declarator->parameter_pack_p = target->parameter_pack_p;
return declarator;
}
+/* Determine whether the declarator we've seen so far can be a
+ parameter pack, when followed by an ellipsis. */
+static bool
+declarator_can_be_parameter_pack (cp_declarator *declarator)
+{
+ /* Search for a declarator name, or any other declarator that goes
+ after the point where the ellipsis could appear in a parameter
+ pack. If we find any of these, then this declarator can not be
+ made into a parameter pack. */
+ bool found = false;
+ while (declarator && !found)
+ {
+ switch ((int)declarator->kind)
+ {
+ case cdk_id:
+ case cdk_error:
+ case cdk_array:
+ case cdk_ptrmem:
+ found = true;
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ declarator = declarator->declarator;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return !found;
+}
+
cp_parameter_declarator *no_parameters;
/* Create a parameter declarator with the indicated DECL_SPECIFIERS,
/* TRUE if the `>' token should be interpreted as the greater-than
operator. FALSE if it is the end of a template-id or
- template-parameter-list. */
+ template-parameter-list. In C++0x mode, this flag also applies to
+ `>>' tokens, which are viewed as two consecutive `>' tokens when
+ this flag is FALSE. */
bool greater_than_is_operator_p;
/* TRUE if default arguments are allowed within a parameter list
static void cp_parser_perform_template_parameter_access_checks
(VEC (deferred_access_check,gc)*);
static tree cp_parser_single_declaration
- (cp_parser *, VEC (deferred_access_check,gc)*, bool, bool *);
+ (cp_parser *, VEC (deferred_access_check,gc)*, bool, bool, bool *);
static tree cp_parser_functional_cast
(cp_parser *, tree);
static tree cp_parser_save_member_function_body
(cp_parser *, tree);
static tree cp_parser_sizeof_operand
(cp_parser *, enum rid);
+static tree cp_parser_trait_expr
+ (cp_parser *, enum rid);
static bool cp_parser_declares_only_class_p
(cp_parser *);
static void cp_parser_set_storage_class
(cp_parser *);
static void cp_parser_skip_to_end_of_block_or_statement
(cp_parser *);
-static void cp_parser_skip_to_closing_brace
+static bool cp_parser_skip_to_closing_brace
(cp_parser *);
static void cp_parser_skip_to_end_of_template_parameter_list
(cp_parser *);
(cp_token *, enum rid);
static tree cp_parser_make_typename_type
(cp_parser *, tree, tree);
+static cp_declarator * cp_parser_make_indirect_declarator
+ (enum tree_code, tree, cp_cv_quals, cp_declarator *);
/* Returns nonzero if we are parsing tentatively. */
}
/* Skip tokens until a non-nested closing curly brace is the next
- token. */
+ token, or there are no more tokens. Return true in the first case,
+ false otherwise. */
-static void
+static bool
cp_parser_skip_to_closing_brace (cp_parser *parser)
{
unsigned nesting_depth = 0;
case CPP_EOF:
case CPP_PRAGMA_EOL:
/* If we've run out of tokens, stop. */
- return;
+ return false;
case CPP_CLOSE_BRACE:
/* If the next token is a non-nested `}', then we have reached
the end of the current block. */
if (nesting_depth-- == 0)
- return;
+ return true;
break;
case CPP_OPEN_BRACE:
return make_typename_type (scope, id, typename_type, tf_error);
}
+/* This is a wrapper around the
+ make_{pointer,ptrmem,reference}_declarator functions that decides
+ which one to call based on the CODE and CLASS_TYPE arguments. The
+ CODE argument should be one of the values returned by
+ cp_parser_ptr_operator. */
+static cp_declarator *
+cp_parser_make_indirect_declarator (enum tree_code code, tree class_type,
+ cp_cv_quals cv_qualifiers,
+ cp_declarator *target)
+{
+ if (code == INDIRECT_REF)
+ if (class_type == NULL_TREE)
+ return make_pointer_declarator (cv_qualifiers, target);
+ else
+ return make_ptrmem_declarator (cv_qualifiers, class_type, target);
+ else if (code == ADDR_EXPR && class_type == NULL_TREE)
+ return make_reference_declarator (cv_qualifiers, target, false);
+ else if (code == NON_LVALUE_EXPR && class_type == NULL_TREE)
+ return make_reference_declarator (cv_qualifiers, target, true);
+ gcc_unreachable ();
+}
/* Create a new C++ parser. */
__builtin_va_arg ( assignment-expression , type-id )
__builtin_offsetof ( type-id , offsetof-expression )
+ C++ Extensions:
+ __has_nothrow_assign ( type-id )
+ __has_nothrow_constructor ( type-id )
+ __has_nothrow_copy ( type-id )
+ __has_trivial_assign ( type-id )
+ __has_trivial_constructor ( type-id )
+ __has_trivial_copy ( type-id )
+ __has_trivial_destructor ( type-id )
+ __has_virtual_destructor ( type-id )
+ __is_abstract ( type-id )
+ __is_base_of ( type-id , type-id )
+ __is_class ( type-id )
+ __is_convertible_to ( type-id , type-id )
+ __is_empty ( type-id )
+ __is_enum ( type-id )
+ __is_pod ( type-id )
+ __is_polymorphic ( type-id )
+ __is_union ( type-id )
+
Objective-C++ Extension:
primary-expression:
&& next_token->type != CPP_CLOSE_SQUARE
/* The closing ">" in a template-argument-list. */
&& (next_token->type != CPP_GREATER
+ || parser->greater_than_is_operator_p)
+ /* C++0x only: A ">>" treated like two ">" tokens,
+ in a template-argument-list. */
+ && (next_token->type != CPP_RSHIFT
+ || (cxx_dialect == cxx98)
|| parser->greater_than_is_operator_p))
cast_p = false;
}
case RID_OFFSETOF:
return cp_parser_builtin_offsetof (parser);
- /* Objective-C++ expressions. */
+ case RID_HAS_NOTHROW_ASSIGN:
+ case RID_HAS_NOTHROW_CONSTRUCTOR:
+ case RID_HAS_NOTHROW_COPY:
+ case RID_HAS_TRIVIAL_ASSIGN:
+ case RID_HAS_TRIVIAL_CONSTRUCTOR:
+ case RID_HAS_TRIVIAL_COPY:
+ case RID_HAS_TRIVIAL_DESTRUCTOR:
+ case RID_HAS_VIRTUAL_DESTRUCTOR:
+ case RID_IS_ABSTRACT:
+ case RID_IS_BASE_OF:
+ case RID_IS_CLASS:
+ case RID_IS_CONVERTIBLE_TO:
+ case RID_IS_EMPTY:
+ case RID_IS_ENUM:
+ case RID_IS_POD:
+ case RID_IS_POLYMORPHIC:
+ case RID_IS_UNION:
+ return cp_parser_trait_expr (parser, token->keyword);
+
+ /* Objective-C++ expressions. */
case RID_AT_ENCODE:
case RID_AT_PROTOCOL:
case RID_AT_SELECTOR:
/* Parse another optional declarator. */
declarator = cp_parser_new_declarator_opt (parser);
- /* Create the representation of the declarator. */
- if (type)
- declarator = make_ptrmem_declarator (cv_quals, type, declarator);
- else if (code == INDIRECT_REF)
- declarator = make_pointer_declarator (cv_quals, declarator);
- else
- declarator = make_reference_declarator (cv_quals, declarator);
-
- return declarator;
+ return cp_parser_make_indirect_declarator
+ (code, type, cv_quals, declarator);
}
/* If the next token is a `[', there is a direct-new-declarator. */
The binops_by_token map is used to get the tree codes for each <token> type.
binary-expressions are associated according to a precedence table. */
-#define TOKEN_PRECEDENCE(token) \
- ((token->type == CPP_GREATER && !parser->greater_than_is_operator_p) \
- ? PREC_NOT_OPERATOR \
- : binops_by_token[token->type].prec)
+#define TOKEN_PRECEDENCE(token) \
+(((token->type == CPP_GREATER \
+ || ((cxx_dialect != cxx98) && token->type == CPP_RSHIFT)) \
+ && !parser->greater_than_is_operator_p) \
+ ? PREC_NOT_OPERATOR \
+ : binops_by_token[token->type].prec)
static tree
cp_parser_binary_expression (cp_parser* parser, bool cast_p)
/* Get an operator token. */
token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
+ if (warn_cxx0x_compat
+ && token->type == CPP_RSHIFT
+ && !parser->greater_than_is_operator_p)
+ {
+ warning (OPT_Wc__0x_compat,
+ "%H%<>>%> operator will be treated as two right angle brackets in C++0x",
+ &token->location);
+ warning (OPT_Wc__0x_compat,
+ "suggest parentheses around %<>>%> expression");
+ }
+
new_prec = TOKEN_PRECEDENCE (token);
/* Popping an entry off the stack means we completed a subexpression:
return expr;
}
+/* Parse a trait expression. */
+
+static tree
+cp_parser_trait_expr (cp_parser* parser, enum rid keyword)
+{
+ cp_trait_kind kind;
+ tree type1, type2 = NULL_TREE;
+ bool binary = false;
+ cp_decl_specifier_seq decl_specs;
+
+ switch (keyword)
+ {
+ case RID_HAS_NOTHROW_ASSIGN:
+ kind = CPTK_HAS_NOTHROW_ASSIGN;
+ break;
+ case RID_HAS_NOTHROW_CONSTRUCTOR:
+ kind = CPTK_HAS_NOTHROW_CONSTRUCTOR;
+ break;
+ case RID_HAS_NOTHROW_COPY:
+ kind = CPTK_HAS_NOTHROW_COPY;
+ break;
+ case RID_HAS_TRIVIAL_ASSIGN:
+ kind = CPTK_HAS_TRIVIAL_ASSIGN;
+ break;
+ case RID_HAS_TRIVIAL_CONSTRUCTOR:
+ kind = CPTK_HAS_TRIVIAL_CONSTRUCTOR;
+ break;
+ case RID_HAS_TRIVIAL_COPY:
+ kind = CPTK_HAS_TRIVIAL_COPY;
+ break;
+ case RID_HAS_TRIVIAL_DESTRUCTOR:
+ kind = CPTK_HAS_TRIVIAL_DESTRUCTOR;
+ break;
+ case RID_HAS_VIRTUAL_DESTRUCTOR:
+ kind = CPTK_HAS_VIRTUAL_DESTRUCTOR;
+ break;
+ case RID_IS_ABSTRACT:
+ kind = CPTK_IS_ABSTRACT;
+ break;
+ case RID_IS_BASE_OF:
+ kind = CPTK_IS_BASE_OF;
+ binary = true;
+ break;
+ case RID_IS_CLASS:
+ kind = CPTK_IS_CLASS;
+ break;
+ case RID_IS_CONVERTIBLE_TO:
+ kind = CPTK_IS_CONVERTIBLE_TO;
+ binary = true;
+ break;
+ case RID_IS_EMPTY:
+ kind = CPTK_IS_EMPTY;
+ break;
+ case RID_IS_ENUM:
+ kind = CPTK_IS_ENUM;
+ break;
+ case RID_IS_POD:
+ kind = CPTK_IS_POD;
+ break;
+ case RID_IS_POLYMORPHIC:
+ kind = CPTK_IS_POLYMORPHIC;
+ break;
+ case RID_IS_UNION:
+ kind = CPTK_IS_UNION;
+ break;
+ default:
+ gcc_unreachable ();
+ }
+
+ /* Consume the token. */
+ cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
+
+ cp_parser_require (parser, CPP_OPEN_PAREN, "`('");
+
+ type1 = cp_parser_type_id (parser);
+
+ /* Build a trivial decl-specifier-seq. */
+ clear_decl_specs (&decl_specs);
+ decl_specs.type = type1;
+
+ /* Call grokdeclarator to figure out what type this is. */
+ type1 = grokdeclarator (NULL, &decl_specs, TYPENAME,
+ /*initialized=*/0, /*attrlist=*/NULL);
+
+ if (binary)
+ {
+ cp_parser_require (parser, CPP_COMMA, "`,'");
+
+ type2 = cp_parser_type_id (parser);
+
+ /* Build a trivial decl-specifier-seq. */
+ clear_decl_specs (&decl_specs);
+ decl_specs.type = type2;
+
+ /* Call grokdeclarator to figure out what type this is. */
+ type2 = grokdeclarator (NULL, &decl_specs, TYPENAME,
+ /*initialized=*/0, /*attrlist=*/NULL);
+ }
+
+ cp_parser_require (parser, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN, "`)'");
+
+ /* Complete the trait expr, which may mean either processing the
+ static assert now or saving it for template instantiation. */
+ return finish_trait_expr (kind, type1, type2);
+}
+
/* Statements [gram.stmt.stmt] */
/* Parse a statement.
return cp_parser_expression (parser, /*cast_p=*/false);
}
+/* We check for a ) immediately followed by ; with no whitespacing
+ between. This is used to issue a warning for:
+
+ while (...);
+
+ and:
+
+ for (...);
+
+ as the semicolon is probably extraneous.
+
+ On parse errors, the next token might not be a ), so do nothing in
+ that case. */
+
+static void
+check_empty_body (cp_parser* parser, const char* type)
+{
+ cp_token *token;
+ cp_token *close_paren;
+ expanded_location close_loc;
+ expanded_location semi_loc;
+
+ close_paren = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
+ if (close_paren->type != CPP_CLOSE_PAREN)
+ return;
+
+ close_loc = expand_location (close_paren->location);
+ token = cp_lexer_peek_nth_token (parser->lexer, 2);
+
+ if (token->type != CPP_SEMICOLON
+ || (token->flags & PREV_WHITE))
+ return;
+
+ semi_loc = expand_location (token->location);
+ if (close_loc.line == semi_loc.line
+#ifdef USE_MAPPED_LOCATION
+ && close_loc.column+1 == semi_loc.column
+#endif
+ )
+ warning (OPT_Wempty_body,
+ "suggest a space before %<;%> or explicit braces around empty "
+ "body in %<%s%> statement",
+ type);
+}
+
/* Parse an iteration-statement.
iteration-statement:
/* Parse the condition. */
condition = cp_parser_condition (parser);
finish_while_stmt_cond (condition, statement);
+ check_empty_body (parser, "while");
/* Look for the `)'. */
cp_parser_require (parser, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN, "`)'");
/* Parse the dependent statement. */
if (cp_lexer_next_token_is_not (parser->lexer, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN))
expression = cp_parser_expression (parser, /*cast_p=*/false);
finish_for_expr (expression, statement);
+ check_empty_body (parser, "for");
/* Look for the `)'. */
cp_parser_require (parser, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN, "`)'");
/* Parse another optional declarator. */
declarator = cp_parser_conversion_declarator_opt (parser);
- /* Create the representation of the declarator. */
- if (class_type)
- declarator = make_ptrmem_declarator (cv_quals, class_type,
- declarator);
- else if (code == INDIRECT_REF)
- declarator = make_pointer_declarator (cv_quals, declarator);
- else
- declarator = make_reference_declarator (cv_quals, declarator);
-
- return declarator;
+ return cp_parser_make_indirect_declarator
+ (code, class_type, cv_quals, declarator);
}
return NULL;
marked as a parameter pack, then we have a parameter pack (that
has no declarator); */
if (!*is_parameter_pack
- && cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_ELLIPSIS))
+ && cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_ELLIPSIS)
+ && declarator_can_be_parameter_pack (parameter_declarator->declarator))
{
-
/* Consume the `...'. */
cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
maybe_warn_variadic_templates ();
cp_parser_single_declaration (parser,
/*checks=*/NULL,
/*member_p=*/false,
+ /*explicit_specialization_p=*/true,
/*friend_p=*/NULL);
/* We're done with the specialization. */
end_specialization ();
if (parser->scope)
{
tree decl;
+ tree ambiguous_decls;
decl = cp_parser_lookup_name (parser, identifier,
tag_type,
/*is_template=*/false,
/*is_namespace=*/false,
/*check_dependency=*/true,
- /*ambiguous_decls=*/NULL);
+ &ambiguous_decls);
+
+ /* If the lookup was ambiguous, an error will already have been
+ issued. */
+ if (ambiguous_decls)
+ return error_mark_node;
/* If we are parsing friend declaration, DECL may be a
TEMPLATE_DECL tree node here. However, we need to check
error ("%<namespace%> definition is not allowed here");
/* Skip the definition. */
cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
- cp_parser_skip_to_closing_brace (parser);
- cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
+ if (cp_parser_skip_to_closing_brace (parser))
+ cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
return;
}
cp_parser_require (parser, CPP_EQ, "`='");
((is_parenthesized_init || !is_initialized)
? 0 : LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING));
}
+ else if ((cxx_dialect != cxx98) && friend_p
+ && decl && TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL)
+ /* Core issue #226 (C++0x only): A default template-argument
+ shall not be specified in a friend class template
+ declaration. */
+ check_default_tmpl_args (decl, current_template_parms, /*is_primary=*/1,
+ /*is_partial=*/0, /*is_friend_decl=*/1);
+
if (!friend_p && pushed_scope)
pop_scope (pushed_scope);
&& !cp_parser_parse_definitely (parser))
declarator = NULL;
- /* Build the representation of the ptr-operator. */
- if (class_type)
- declarator = make_ptrmem_declarator (cv_quals,
- class_type,
- declarator);
- else if (code == INDIRECT_REF)
- declarator = make_pointer_declarator (cv_quals, declarator);
- else
- declarator = make_reference_declarator (cv_quals, declarator);
+ declarator = cp_parser_make_indirect_declarator
+ (code, class_type, cv_quals, declarator);
}
/* Everything else is a direct-declarator. */
else
& cv-qualifier-seq [opt]
Returns INDIRECT_REF if a pointer, or pointer-to-member, was used.
- Returns ADDR_EXPR if a reference was used. In the case of a
- pointer-to-member, *TYPE is filled in with the TYPE containing the
- member. *CV_QUALS is filled in with the cv-qualifier-seq, or
- TYPE_UNQUALIFIED, if there are no cv-qualifiers. Returns
- ERROR_MARK if an error occurred. */
-
+ Returns ADDR_EXPR if a reference was used, or NON_LVALUE_EXPR for
+ an rvalue reference. In the case of a pointer-to-member, *TYPE is
+ filled in with the TYPE containing the member. *CV_QUALS is
+ filled in with the cv-qualifier-seq, or TYPE_UNQUALIFIED, if there
+ are no cv-qualifiers. Returns ERROR_MARK if an error occurred.
+ Note that the tree codes returned by this function have nothing
+ to do with the types of trees that will be eventually be created
+ to represent the pointer or reference type being parsed. They are
+ just constants with suggestive names. */
static enum tree_code
cp_parser_ptr_operator (cp_parser* parser,
tree* type,
/* Peek at the next token. */
token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
- /* If it's a `*' or `&' we have a pointer or reference. */
- if (token->type == CPP_MULT || token->type == CPP_AND)
- {
- /* Remember which ptr-operator we were processing. */
- code = (token->type == CPP_AND ? ADDR_EXPR : INDIRECT_REF);
- /* Consume the `*' or `&'. */
+ /* If it's a `*', `&' or `&&' we have a pointer or reference. */
+ if (token->type == CPP_MULT)
+ code = INDIRECT_REF;
+ else if (token->type == CPP_AND)
+ code = ADDR_EXPR;
+ else if ((cxx_dialect != cxx98) &&
+ token->type == CPP_AND_AND) /* C++0x only */
+ code = NON_LVALUE_EXPR;
+
+ if (code != ERROR_MARK)
+ {
+ /* Consume the `*', `&' or `&&'. */
cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
/* A `*' can be followed by a cv-qualifier-seq, and so can a
cp_parser_attributes_opt (parser));
}
- /* If the next token is an ellipsis, and the type of the declarator
- contains parameter packs but it is not a TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION, then
- we actually have a parameter pack expansion expression. Otherwise,
- leave the ellipsis for a C-style variadic function. */
+ /* If the next token is an ellipsis, and we have not seen a
+ declarator name, and the type of the declarator contains parameter
+ packs but it is not a TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION, then we actually have
+ a parameter pack expansion expression. Otherwise, leave the
+ ellipsis for a C-style variadic function. */
token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_ELLIPSIS))
{
tree type = decl_specifiers.type;
- if (DECL_P (type))
+ if (type && DECL_P (type))
type = TREE_TYPE (type);
- if (TREE_CODE (type) != TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION
+ if (type
+ && TREE_CODE (type) != TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION
+ && declarator_can_be_parameter_pack (declarator)
&& (!declarator || !declarator->parameter_pack_p)
&& uses_parameter_packs (type))
{
- /* Consume the `...'. */
- cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
- maybe_warn_variadic_templates ();
-
- /* Build a pack expansion type */
- if (declarator)
- declarator->parameter_pack_p = true;
- else
- decl_specifiers.type = make_pack_expansion (type);
- }
+ /* Consume the `...'. */
+ cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
+ maybe_warn_variadic_templates ();
+
+ /* Build a pack expansion type */
+ if (declarator)
+ declarator->parameter_pack_p = true;
+ else
+ decl_specifiers.type = make_pack_expansion (type);
+ }
}
/* The restriction on defining new types applies only to the type
++depth;
break;
+ case CPP_RSHIFT:
+ if (cxx_dialect == cxx98)
+ break;
+ /* Fall through for C++0x, which treats the `>>'
+ operator like two `>' tokens in certain
+ cases. */
+
case CPP_GREATER:
/* If we see a non-nested `>', and `>' is not an
operator, then it marks the end of the default
entire class body. */
if (!xref_basetypes (type, bases))
{
- cp_parser_skip_to_closing_brace (parser);
-
/* Consuming the closing brace yields better error messages
later on. */
- cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
+ if (cp_parser_skip_to_closing_brace (parser))
+ cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
pop_deferring_access_checks ();
return error_mark_node;
}
token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
/* If the next token is a semicolon, consume it. */
if (token->type == CPP_SEMICOLON)
- cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
+ {
+ if (pedantic && !in_system_header)
+ pedwarn ("extra %<;%>");
+ cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
+ }
return;
}
else
decl = cp_parser_single_declaration (parser,
checks,
member_p,
+ /*explicit_specialization_p=*/false,
&friend_p);
pop_deferring_access_checks ();
cp_parser_single_declaration (cp_parser* parser,
VEC (deferred_access_check,gc)* checks,
bool member_p,
+ bool explicit_specialization_p,
bool* friend_p)
{
int declares_class_or_enum;
if (!decl
&& (cp_lexer_next_token_is_not (parser->lexer, CPP_SEMICOLON)
|| decl_specifiers.type != error_mark_node))
- decl = cp_parser_init_declarator (parser,
- &decl_specifiers,
- checks,
- /*function_definition_allowed_p=*/true,
- member_p,
- declares_class_or_enum,
- &function_definition_p);
+ {
+ decl = cp_parser_init_declarator (parser,
+ &decl_specifiers,
+ checks,
+ /*function_definition_allowed_p=*/true,
+ member_p,
+ declares_class_or_enum,
+ &function_definition_p);
+
+ /* 7.1.1-1 [dcl.stc]
+
+ A storage-class-specifier shall not be specified in an explicit
+ specialization... */
+ if (decl
+ && explicit_specialization_p
+ && decl_specifiers.storage_class != sc_none)
+ {
+ error ("explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class");
+ decl = error_mark_node;
+ }
+ }
pop_deferring_access_checks ();
saved_skip_evaluation = skip_evaluation;
skip_evaluation = false;
/* Parse the template-argument-list itself. */
- if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_GREATER))
+ if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_GREATER)
+ || cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_RSHIFT))
arguments = NULL_TREE;
else
arguments = cp_parser_template_argument_list (parser);
a '>>' instead, it's probably just a typo. */
if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_RSHIFT))
{
- if (!saved_greater_than_is_operator_p)
+ if (cxx_dialect != cxx98)
+ {
+ /* In C++0x, a `>>' in a template argument list or cast
+ expression is considered to be two separate `>'
+ tokens. So, change the current token to a `>', but don't
+ consume it: it will be consumed later when the outer
+ template argument list (or cast expression) is parsed.
+ Note that this replacement of `>' for `>>' is necessary
+ even if we are parsing tentatively: in the tentative
+ case, after calling
+ cp_parser_enclosed_template_argument_list we will always
+ throw away all of the template arguments and the first
+ closing `>', either because the template argument list
+ was erroneous or because we are replacing those tokens
+ with a CPP_TEMPLATE_ID token. The second `>' (which will
+ not have been thrown away) is needed either to close an
+ outer template argument list or to complete a new-style
+ cast. */
+ cp_token *token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
+ token->type = CPP_GREATER;
+ }
+ else if (!saved_greater_than_is_operator_p)
{
/* If we're in a nested template argument list, the '>>' has
to be a typo for '> >'. We emit the error message, but we
"within a nested template argument list",
&token->location);
- /* ??? Proper recovery should terminate two levels of
- template argument list here. */
token->type = CPP_GREATER;
}
else
++level;
break;
+ case CPP_RSHIFT:
+ if (cxx_dialect == cxx98)
+ /* C++0x views the `>>' operator as two `>' tokens, but
+ C++98 does not. */
+ break;
+ else if (!nesting_depth && level-- == 0)
+ {
+ /* We've hit a `>>' where the first `>' closes the
+ template argument list, and the second `>' is
+ spurious. Just consume the `>>' and stop; we've
+ already produced at least one error. */
+ cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
+ return;
+ }
+ /* Fall through for C++0x, so we handle the second `>' in
+ the `>>'. */
+
case CPP_GREATER:
if (!nesting_depth && level-- == 0)
{
return (token->type == CPP_OPEN_BRACE || token->type == CPP_COLON);
}
-/* Returns TRUE iff the next token is the "," or ">" ending a
- template-argument. */
+/* Returns TRUE iff the next token is the "," or ">" (or `>>', in
+ C++0x) ending a template-argument. */
static bool
cp_parser_next_token_ends_template_argument_p (cp_parser *parser)
token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
return (token->type == CPP_COMMA
|| token->type == CPP_GREATER
- || token->type == CPP_ELLIPSIS);
+ || token->type == CPP_ELLIPSIS
+ || ((cxx_dialect != cxx98) && token->type == CPP_RSHIFT));
}
/* Returns TRUE iff the n-th token is a "<", or the n-th is a "[" and the
git://gcc.gnu.org / gcc.git / blobdiff