Bug 97816 - [11 Regression] ICE in good_cloning_opportunity_p, at ipa-cp.c:3266 since r11-4949-gb86aedb0cc083efe712e530a723f1237051a6b56
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in good_cloning_opportunity_p, at ipa-cp.c:3266 since r11...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: ipa (show other bugs)
Version: 11.0
: P1 normal
Target Milestone: 11.0
Assignee: Martin Jambor
URL:
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Depends on:
Blocks: spec
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2020-11-13 12:08 UTC by Martin Liška
Modified: 2020-12-07 12:04 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:
Known to work: 10.2.0
Known to fail: 11.0
Last reconfirmed: 2020-11-13 00:00:00


Attachments
test-case (10.57 KB, application/x-bzip)
2020-11-13 12:08 UTC, Martin Liška
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Liška 2020-11-13 12:08:45 UTC
Created attachment 49554 [details]
test-case

It's reduced from gcc SPEC2017 test:

$ gcc -std=c99 -O3 -flto=1 -march=znver1 -g -fprofile-generate -fgnu89-inline -shared -fPIC reduced/*.
...
during IPA pass: cp
lto1: internal compiler error: in good_cloning_opportunity_p, at ipa-cp.c:3266
0x22cc3b2 good_cloning_opportunity_p
	/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:3266
0x22d331a decide_about_value<tree_node*>
	/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:5502
0x22d1cc4 decide_whether_version_node
	/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:5573
0x22d25b9 ipcp_decision_stage
	/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:5754
0x22d2e53 ipcp_driver
	/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:5942
0x22d3014 execute
	/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:6017

I'm reducing that more, but it goes very slowly.
Comment 1 Martin Liška 2020-11-13 12:10:36 UTC
Apparently, without the '-fPIC' option.
Comment 2 Martin Liška 2020-11-13 12:16:12 UTC
size_cost: -2147480169

So it's likely about an integer overflow..
Comment 3 Martin Jambor 2020-11-13 12:41:45 UTC
I see, mine.
Comment 4 GCC Commits 2020-11-13 17:30:31 UTC
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor <jamborm@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e97d6443f0a862ce9b798084499635914e3b8c6

commit r11-5000-g2e97d6443f0a862ce9b798084499635914e3b8c6
Author: Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
Date:   Fri Nov 13 18:30:11 2020 +0100

    ipa-cp: One more safe_add (PR 97816)
    
    The new behavior of safe_add triggered an ICE because of one use where
    it had not been used instead of a simple addition.  I'll fix it with the
    following obvious patch so that periodic benchmarkers can continue
    working because a proper fix (see below) will need a review.
    
    The testcase showed me, however, that we can propagate time and cost
    from one lattice to another more than once even when that was not the
    intent.  I'll address that as a follow-up after I verify it does not
    affect the IPA-CP heuristics too much or change the corresponding
    params accordingly.
    
    Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
    2020-11-13  Martin Jambor  <mjambor@suse.cz>
    
            PR ipa/97816
            * ipa-cp.c (value_topo_info<valtype>::propagate_effects): Use
            safe_add instead of a simple addition.
Comment 5 Martin Jambor 2020-11-13 17:31:59 UTC
As noted in the commit message above, the ICE will go away but the underlying issue stays so please keep this opened until I fix it, hopefully no later than next week.
Comment 6 GCC Commits 2020-12-07 08:35:50 UTC
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor <jamborm@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6a0db7d1bc7ad640bab51769e53f1cb4ad4bb88

commit r11-5811-ga6a0db7d1bc7ad640bab51769e53f1cb4ad4bb88
Author: Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
Date:   Mon Dec 7 09:35:09 2020 +0100

    ipa-cp: Avoid unwanted multiple propagations (PR 97816)
    
    When looking at the testcase of PR 97816 I realized that the reason
    why we were hitting overflows in size growth estimates in IPA-CP is
    not because the chains of how lattices feed values to each other are
    so long but mainly because we add estimates in callee lattices to
    caller lattices for each value source, which roughly corresponds to a
    call graph edge, and therefore if there are multiple calls between two
    functions passing the same value in a parameter we end up doing it
    more than once, sometimes actually quite many times.
    
    This patch avoids it by using a has_set to remember the source values
    we have already updated and not increasing their size again.
    Furhtermore, to improve estimation of times we scale the propagated
    time benefits with edge frequencies as we accumulate them.
    
    This should make any overflows very unlikely but not impossible, so I
    still included checks for overflows but decided to restructure the
    code to only need it in the propagate_effects function and modified it
    so that it does not need to perform the check before each sum.
    
    This is because I decided to add local estimates to propagated
    estimates already in propagate_effects and not at the evaluation time.
    The function can then do the sums in a wide type and discard them in
    the unlikely case of an overflow.  I also decided to use the
    opportunity to make propagated effect stats now include stats from
    other values in the same SCCs.  In the dumps I have seen this tended
    to increase size cost a tiny bit more than the estimated time benefit
    but both increases were small.
    
    Martin
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
    2020-11-20  Martin Jambor  <mjambor@suse.cz>
    
            PR ipa/97816
            * ipa-cp.c (safe_add): Removed.
            (good_cloning_opportunity_p): Remove special handling of INT_MAX.
            (value_topo_info<valtype>::propagate_effects): Take care not to
            propagate from size one value to another through more sources.  Scale
            propagated times with edge frequencies.  Include local time and size
            in propagates ones here.  Take care not to overflow size.
            (decide_about_value): Do not add local and propagated effects when
            passing them to good_cloning_opportunity_p.
Comment 7 Martin Jambor 2020-12-07 12:04:33 UTC
Now fixed properly.