Bug 9248 - [m68k] compiling C++ file from ACE causes ICE on m68k-rtems target
Summary: [m68k] compiling C++ file from ACE causes ICE on m68k-rtems target
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 8343
Alias: None
Product: gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: target (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2.1
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jim Wilson
URL:
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-01-09 08:06 UTC by wileypob
Modified: 2003-06-12 00:15 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:
Known to work:
Known to fail:
Last reconfirmed:

Attachments
Stats.ii.gz (139.15 KB, application/x-gzip )
2003-05-21 15:17 UTC, wileypob 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description wileypob 2003-01-09 08:06:01 UTC 
When compiling a C++ file, I received an ICE for a couple of the m68k targets (-mcpu32 and -m68040).

Release:
3.2.1 (with rtems patch  ftp://ftp.oarcorp.com/pub/rtems/cd-working/tools/gcc3.2.1newlib1.10.0-4/source/gcc-3.2.1-rtems-20021209.diff)

Environment:
target m68k-rtems (elf)
host i686-cygwin (running on Windows 2000)
$ m68k-rtems-g++ -v
Reading specs from /cygdrive/c/m68k-rtems-tools/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-rtems/3.2.1/specs
Configured with: ../gcc-3.2.1/configure --target=m68k-rtems --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-newlib --verbose --enable-threads --prefix=/cygdrive/c/m68k-rtems-tools --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: rtems
gcc version 3.2.1

How-To-Repeat:
m68k-rtems-g++ -mcpu32 -c Stats.ii
m68k-rtems-g++ -m68040 -c Stats.ii
Comment 1 Joel Sherrill 2003-01-09 12:08:07 UTC 
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-Why: Confirmed on m68k-elf.  Does not fail if using 
    -m5200 or -m68000.  Appears to be independent of
    optimization level.
Comment 2 Jim Wilson 2003-02-27 22:24:52 UTC 
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->wilson
Responsible-Changed-Why: Why not?
Comment 3 Jim Wilson 2003-02-27 22:24:52 UTC 
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->analyzed
State-Changed-Why: Not waiting for feedback from original submitter, has only been analyzed.
Comment 4 Jim Wilson 2003-02-27 22:38:20 UTC 
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8343 ***