reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de writes:
 
 [...]
 
 | I think that Gaby's patch
 | 
 | http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-08/msg00197.html
 | 
 | caused the regression, since the patch below fixes the
 | problem for me. (I didn't do a bootstrap or regression
 | tests, though.)
 | >How-To-Repeat:
 | g++ -c
 | >Fix:
 | ===========================================================
 | --- gcc-old/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/valarray_meta.h	Sat Jan  4 01:37:31 2003
 | +++ gcc-new/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/valarray_meta.h	Wed Jan  8 23:26:44 2003
 | @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ namespace std
 |        _UnBase(const _Arg& __e) : _M_expr(__e) {}
 |  
 |        value_type operator[](size_t __i) const
 | -      { return _M_expr[__i]; }
 | +      { return _Oper() (_M_expr[__i]); }
 
 
 This analysis is correct.  Patch approved.
 
 Thanks!
 
 -- Gaby

Release:
unknown