The following c++11 code does not compile with gcc-5.1.0 while it is fine with gcc-4.9.2, and gcc-4.8.3. [user@host gcc]$ cat lambda.cpp int gvar=1; template<int I> void tfun(){ int const var=gvar; auto f=[=](){return var*var;}; } void fun(){ tfun<1>(); } [user@host gcc]$ /home/user/opt/gcc/5.1.0/bin/g++-5.1 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/home/user/opt/gcc/5.1.0/bin/g++-5.1 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/user/opt/gcc/5.1.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.1.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ./configure --program-suffix=-5.1 --prefix=/home/user/opt/gcc/5.1.0 --with-gmp=/home/user/local --with-mpfr=/home/user/local --with-mpc=/home/user/local --disable-libjava Thread model: posix gcc version 5.1.0 (GCC) [user@host gcc]$ /home/user/opt/gcc/5.1.0/bin/g++-5.1 -std=c++11 -c lambda.cpp lambda.cpp: In instantiation of 'tfun()::<lambda()> [with int I = 1]': lambda.cpp:6:12: required from 'struct tfun() [with int I = 1]::<lambda()>' lambda.cpp:6:31: required from 'void tfun() [with int I = 1]' lambda.cpp:10:11: required from here lambda.cpp:6:26: error: redeclaration of 'const int var' auto f=[=](){return var*var;}; ^ lambda.cpp:6:26: note: 'const int var' previously declared here lambda.cpp: In instantiation of 'void tfun() [with int I = 1]': lambda.cpp:10:11: required from here lambda.cpp:6:10: sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported auto f=[=](){return var*var;}; ^ I also tried with the options, `-Wall -Wextra' and `-fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations', but nothing changed. The error is also reproduced with the latest version of GCC: http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/yOs7mqpdpKKGNllN The error seems to occur in the following situation: - A lambda expression is in a function template or a class template. - A variable of `const int' is implicitly captured with `[=]' or `[&]'. (Interestingly, the error is not reproduced with `const double' or `int' variables.) - The variable is used more than once in the lambda expression. - The variable is initialized with a non-constant value (which cannot be statically determined). This may be related to Bug 64791 (RESOLVED FIXED) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64791
duplicate *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 65843 ***