The following code causes an ICE when compiled with the current gcc trunk at -O3 on x86_64-linux in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes. This is a regression from 4.8.x. $ gcc-trunk -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc-trunk COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,fortran,lto --enable-checking=release --with-gmp=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20130924 (experimental) [trunk revision 202859] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c $ gcc-4.8 -O3 small.c $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c small.c: In function ‘main’: small.c:13:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault main () ^ 0x8108ef crash_signal ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/toplev.c:335 0x83b957 ssa_default_def(function*, tree_node*) ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-dfa.c:310 0x83bcc0 get_or_create_ssa_default_def(function*, tree_node*) ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-dfa.c:362 0x8569ec get_reaching_def ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:1184 0x85ca82 maybe_replace_use ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:1791 0x85ca82 rewrite_update_stmt ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:1974 0x85ca82 rewrite_update_dom_walker::before_dom_children(basic_block_def*) ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:2150 0xb99ed7 dom_walker::walk(basic_block_def*) ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/domwalk.c:176 0x85560c rewrite_blocks ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:2209 0x85bce6 update_ssa(unsigned int) ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:3294 0x9826bd insert_range_assertions ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-vrp.c:6103 0x9826bd execute_vrp ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-vrp.c:9572 0x9826bd execute ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-vrp.c:9673 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. $ ------------------------------------------- static int a, b; char *c; short *d, e; int f; short foo (int p1, int p2) { return p2 >= 0 || p1 > 1 >> p2 ? p1 : p1 << p2; } int main () { int *g = &f, h; for (b = 4; b; b--) { for (a = 0; a < 5; a++) { e = foo (h != 0, *d); *g |= e; *d = 0; } *c = 0; } return 0; }
Started with r199048, so sounds like one of the many dups of the reassoc scheduling bugs.
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Started with r199048, so sounds like one of the many dups of the reassoc > scheduling bugs. Jakub, I think you are right. I somehow forgot to check it against the proposed patch for 57393, which makes this ICE disappear.
Dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 57393 ***