Bug 32976 - lapack 3.1.1 test major failure
Summary: lapack 3.1.1 test major failure
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 323
Alias: None
Product: gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: fortran (show other bugs)
Version: 2.95.3
: P3 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-08-03 10:24 UTC by sliwa@cft.edu.pl
Modified: 2007-08-03 12:09 UTC (History)
50 users (show)

See Also:
Host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Build: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Known to work:
Known to fail:
Last reconfirmed:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description sliwa@cft.edu.pl 2007-08-03 10:24:25 UTC
There are major failures in the lapack 3.1.1 tests with gcc 2.95.3 and in the full range up to gcc 4.2.1. The problem seems to appear on 32-bit i386, when the routines chgeqz and zhgeqz are compiled with -O2.

With 2.95.3 I get:

cgd.out:

 Matrix order=    8, type=15, seed=2866, 214,   1,1861, result  5 is 8.389E+06
 Matrix order=   10, type=15, seed= 362, 860,1065,1109, result  5 is 8.389E+06
 Matrix order=   12, type=15, seed=2619,3620,1934,2301, result  5 is 8.389E+06
 Matrix order=   20, type=15, seed=1185,3266, 461, 701, result  5 is 8.389E+06
 CGV drivers:      4 out of   1092 tests failed to pass the threshold

zgd.out:
 Matrix order=    8, type=15, seed=2866, 214,   1,1861, result  5 is 4.504E+15
 Matrix order=   10, type=15, seed= 362, 860,1065,1109, result  5 is 4.504E+15
 Matrix order=   12, type=15, seed=2619,3620,1934,2301, result  5 is 4.504E+15
 Matrix order=   20, type=15, seed=1185,3266, 461, 701, result  5 is 4.504E+15
 ZGV drivers:      4 out of   1092 tests failed to pass the threshold

(notice that the failing cases are the same)


With 4.2.1:
 CGV drivers:     65 out of   1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
 ZGV drivers:     66 out of   1092 tests failed to pass the threshold


This may be similar to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1645
Comment 1 sliwa@cft.edu.pl 2007-08-03 12:09:51 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 ***