User account creation filtered due to spam.
While gij is unified to java, so is gcj neither to javac or to any other.
What look better?
which has some style, or
which would be equal to java and gij. I prefer the last possiblity for gij and gcj.
It could be a 'de facto' standard and fixed in 4.0.
Confirmed, related to PR 1374.
Subject: Re: uniform passing of the classpath parameter
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-21 00:02 -------
>Confirmed, related to PR 1374.
Ok. But from Sun's side, their actual verions 1.4 and 1.5 are the
benchmark, and they are the same for this little topic.
The only missing option here is "gcj -cp foo".
cvs head gcj accepts "-classpath foo" (not sure if 3.x did).
gij accepts both short and long forms of options, and
All P1 enhancements not targeted towards 4.1, moving to P5.
Closing as won't fix as the Java front-end has been removed from the trunk.