With the code I'm going to attach in a second, I get this:
spec/src> c++ -O3 -c sparse_matrix.double.ii
include/lac/sparse_matrix.h: In member function `typename
SparseMatrix<number>::const_iterator SparseMatrix<number>::begin() const [with
number = double]':
include/lac/sparse_matrix.h:2126: error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit
include/lac/sparse_matrix.h:2126: internal compiler error: verify_stmts
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Created attachment 7129 [details]
Unreduced sources. I won't have time to reduce them for a while, so if
someone wants to beat me to it, I'd be happy.
Forgot to say, this is with yesterday's CVS.
BTW, we should not emit this stuff with error(), but rather internal_error()
because this way it seems a normal diagnostic.
This is more likely a front-end problem rather than a tree-optimization problem.
This is most likely a dup of bug 17483.
Yes this is a dup of bug 17483.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17483 ***