Bug 16062 - internal compiler error in Octave CVS
Summary: internal compiler error in Octave CVS
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 15165
Alias: None
Product: gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: c++ (show other bugs)
Version: 3.4.0
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-06-18 14:57 UTC by Gert Van den Eynde
Modified: 2005-07-23 22:49 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Build: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Known to work:
Known to fail:
Last reconfirmed:


Attachments
temporary file created with -save-temps (194.55 KB, application/x-gzip)
2004-06-18 14:59 UTC, Gert Van den Eynde
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gert Van den Eynde 2004-06-18 14:57:06 UTC
fails to build OctaveCVS of 18th June: 
g++ -c  -fPIC -I. -I.. -I../liboctave -I../src -I../libcruft/misc  -I../glob 
-I../glob -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -mieee-fp -Wall -W -Wshadow -g -O2 lex.cc -o 
pic/lex.o -save-temps 
In file included from lex.l:74: 
./oct-gperf.h: In function `const octave_kw* octave_kw_lookup(const char*, 
unsigned int)': 
./oct-gperf.h:175: internal compiler error: in instantiate_template, at 
cp/pt.c:8668 
Please submit a full bug report, 
with preprocessed source if appropriate. 
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Comment 1 Gert Van den Eynde 2004-06-18 14:59:27 UTC
Created attachment 6564 [details]
temporary file created with -save-temps
Comment 2 Wolfgang Bangerth 2004-06-18 15:42:03 UTC
This compiles cleanly for me, but with a present CVS snapshot of gcc. 
Can someone please try to confirm whether this has been fixed already 
since the 3.4.0 release? 
 
Can you please also post the output of gcc -v? 
 
Thanks 
  Wolfgang 
Comment 3 Wolfgang Bangerth 2004-06-18 15:45:19 UTC
If it has already been fixed in 3.4.1, it could be a duplicate 
of PR 15165. Gert, at the point where it ICEs the compiler, do 
you use something that resembles the code in PR 15165? 
 
Thanks 
  Wolfgang 
Comment 4 Andrew Pinski 2004-06-18 15:54:52 UTC
Yes this is a dup of bug 15165.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15165 ***
Comment 5 Gert Van den Eynde 2004-06-21 12:05:43 UTC
ok. sorry for the double post. should have looked better in the bug list.