| Summary: | [C++0x] initialization construct interpreted as function declaration | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | gcc | Reporter: | Nathan Ridge <zeratul976> |
| Component: | c++ | Assignee: | Jason Merrill <jason> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | jason |
| Priority: | P3 | ||
| Version: | 4.6.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 4.6.1 | ||
| Host: | Target: | ||
| Build: | Known to work: | ||
| Known to fail: | Last reconfirmed: | 2011-05-25 15:42:06 | |
Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 19:50:49 2011 New Revision: 174225 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174225 Log: PR c++/47184 * parser.c (cp_parser_parameter_declaration): Recognize list-initialization. (cp_parser_direct_declarator): Check for the closing paren before parsing definitely. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist51.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 20:29:39 2011 New Revision: 174232 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174232 Log: PR c++/47184 * parser.c (cp_parser_parameter_declaration): Recognize list-initialization. (cp_parser_direct_declarator): Check for the closing paren before parsing definitely. Added: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist51.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cp/parser.c branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog Fixed for 4.6.1. ...and actually change status. |
For the following code: struct S { int a; float b; }; struct T { T(S s) {} }; int main() { T t(S{1, 0.1}); // ERROR HERE } gcc 4.6 trunk gives the following errors (with the --std=c++0x option): decl.cpp: In function 'int main()': decl.cpp:14:10: error: expected ')' before '{' token decl.cpp:14:10: error: a function-definition is not allowed here before '{' token decl.cpp:14:18: error: expected primary-expression before ')' token decl.cpp:14:18: error: expected ';' before ')' token It seems gcc is interpreting the statement as a function declaration. I think this is valid C++0x.