Bug 32834

Summary: [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
Product: gcc Reporter: Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele>
Component: fortranAssignee: Not yet assigned to anyone <unassigned>
Status: NEW ---    
Severity: normal CC: d, dfranke, gcc-bugs, P.Schaffnit, pinskia, tkoenig
Priority: P3 Keywords: meta-bug
Version: 4.3.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Host: Target:
Build: Known to work:
Known to fail: Last reconfirmed: 2007-07-20 12:25:13
Bug Depends on: 34640, 35718, 47359, 48890, 50392, 59104, 64107, 64124, 65428, 66328, 19925, 29396, 29606, 30625, 30871, 30964, 31197, 31205, 31211, 31213, 31214, 31217, 31229, 31258, 31487, 31564, 31608, 31609, 31879, 32129, 32594, 32682, 32703, 32710, 32760, 32867, 32875, 32881, 32903, 32906, 32928, 32962, 33139, 33152, 33162, 33241, 33288, 33317, 33334, 33337, 33370, 33499, 33541, 33566, 33636, 33686, 33689, 33749, 33759, 33811, 33818, 33881, 33888, 33897, 33941, 33957, 33998, 34008, 34084, 34137, 34192, 34209, 34231, 34248, 34262, 34335, 34359, 34370, 34396, 34404, 34429, 34431, 34432, 34438, 34471, 34476, 34530, 34537, 34540, 34545, 34556, 34557, 34558, 34559, 34560, 34564, 34565, 34566, 34672, 34704, 34759, 34760, 34763, 34782, 34784, 34785, 34820, 34838, 34861, 34875, 34876, 34945, 34946, 34955, 35001, 35184, 35470, 35681, 35698, 35723, 35769, 35770, 35820, 35837, 35840, 35846, 35945, 36091, 36167, 36214, 36374, 36454, 36746, 36886, 37099, 37193, 37199, 37274, 37411, 37445, 37597, 37614, 37626, 37723, 37749, 37787, 37836, 37926, 38065, 38135, 38471, 38538, 38594, 38657, 38665, 38669, 38672, 38852, 38859, 38883, 38887, 38907, 38914, 38915, 38917, 38918, 39006, 39295, 39304, 39528, 40018, 40443, 40551, 40822, 40847, 40848, 41044, 41278, 41478, 41479, 41515, 41772, 41777, 41869, 42008, 42481, 42650, 42684, 42851, 42888, 42936, 42999, 43040, 43532, 44735, 45338, 45489, 45777, 46638, 47051, 47154, 47348, 47844, 48831, 49648, 49755, 50327, 56867, 57023, 58749, 66377    
Bug Blocks: 42361    

Description Joost VandeVondele 2007-07-20 08:13:24 UTC
This meta-bug tries to list all rejects-valid and ice-on-valid-code that can be triggered with standard Fortran 95 conforming code, are not arch specific, and can not reasonably be called a limit of the compiler. In full agreement with pault, I think fixing these should be a priority.
Comment 1 Joost VandeVondele 2007-07-20 08:20:26 UTC
only 1 open since 2005, 2 open since 2006, others are 2007.
Comment 2 Thomas Koenig 2007-07-20 16:42:10 UTC
Should we open another PR for wrong-code errors?
Comment 3 Joost VandeVondele 2007-07-20 17:02:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Should we open another PR for wrong-code errors?

no, I overlooked that keyword, and they belong to this category (though I'll again  ignore arch specific ones). I'll add them to the list shortly. 
Comment 4 Joost VandeVondele 2007-07-20 17:17:23 UTC
from the 19 wrong code bugs I've only retained 8 that I judged as user visible, F95, and triggered without additional options.