| Summary: | [meta-bug] C++98 standard conformance issues | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | gcc | Reporter: | Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke <amylaar> |
| Component: | c++ | Assignee: | Not yet assigned to anyone <unassigned> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | bkoz, fang, gcc-bugs, jason, nathan, webrown.cpp |
| Priority: | P3 | Keywords: | meta-bug |
| Version: | 4.1.1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Host: | Target: | ||
| Build: | Known to work: | ||
| Known to fail: | Last reconfirmed: | 2006-11-15 17:17:33 | |
| Bug Depends on: | 2316, 28985, 29027, 29040, 7221, 12333, 20039, 20416, 28986, 28988, 28989, 29018, 29024, 29039, 29041, 29043, 54216 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 29842 | ||
|
Description
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2006-11-15 15:13:13 UTC
cc-ing C++ FE maintainers This doesn't seem a very useful meta-bug. Every bug with Component=c++ and Keywords=rejects-valid is a standard conformance issue. What's the point of this one? (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > This doesn't seem a very useful meta-bug. Every bug with Component=c++ and > Keywords=rejects-valid is a standard conformance issue. > > What's the point of this one? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Feel free to close if non-useful. After discussion on IRC we've decided to close this. There are a number of C++98 conformance issues not tracked by this bug, and we don't have a meta-bug for c++11/c++14/c++17/... conformance, and the outstanding bugs it depends on (2316 12333 28985 29027 29040) are all also relevant to later standards, so are not specific to c++98 anyway. INVALID doesn't really describe the situation, but it'll do. |