Bug 19713

Summary: ICE with (void) parameter list
Product: gcc Reporter: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon>
Component: javaAssignee: Not yet assigned to anyone <unassigned>
Severity: minor CC: gcc-bugs, java-prs, pinskia
Priority: P2 Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
Version: 4.0.0   
Target Milestone: 4.3.0   
Host: Target:
Build: Known to work:
Known to fail: Last reconfirmed: 2005-09-30 05:28:54
Bug Depends on: 28067    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Kalle Olavi Niemitalo 2005-01-30 18:12:55 UTC
$ cat void.java
class X {
    void y(void) {
$ gcj -v -C void.java
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: /home/kalle/src/FOREIGN-CVS/gcc/configure --prefix=/home/kalle
--exec-prefix=/home/kalle/i386-pc-linux-gnu --host=i386-pc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0 20050129 (experimental)

/home/kalle/stow/gcc/i386-pc-linux-gnu/bin/../libexec/gcc/i386-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.0/jc1 void.java -quiet -dumpbase void.java -auxbase-strip NONE -g1 -version
-fsyntax-only -femit-class-files -o /dev/null
GNU Java version 4.0.0 20050129 (experimental) (i386-pc-linux-gnu)
	compiled by GNU C version 4.0.0 20050103 (experimental).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
Class path starts here:
/home/kalle/stow/gcc/i386-pc-linux-gnu/bin/../lib/gcc/../../../share/java/libgcj-4.0.0.jar/ (system) (zip)
void.java:2: error: ')' expected.
       void y(void) {
void.java:2: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree_list, have
expr_with_file_location in method_header, at java/parse.y:4691
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Comment 1 Andrew Pinski 2005-01-30 18:14:40 UTC
Comment 2 Andrew Pinski 2005-09-30 05:28:53 UTC
I see this a lot when I accidently write java code after having writting C and C++ code.
Comment 3 Tom Tromey 2007-01-09 20:47:02 UTC
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.