14.21.8.1 Changing One RTL SSA Instruction

Before making a change, passes should first use a statement like the following:

auto attempt = crtl->ssa->new_change_attempt ();

Here, attempt is an RAII object that should remain in scope for the entire change attempt. It automatically frees temporary memory related to the changes when it goes out of scope.

Next, the pass should create an rtl_ssa::insn_change object for the instruction that it wants to change. This object specifies several things:

If a pass was attempting to change all these properties of an instruction insn, it might do something like this:

rtl_ssa::insn_change change (insn);
change.new_defs = …;
change.new_uses = …;
change.move_range = …;

This rtl_ssa::insn_change only describes something that the pass might do; at this stage, nothing has actually changed.

As noted above, the default move_range requires the instruction to remain where it is. At the other extreme, it is possible to allow the instruction to move anywhere within its extended basic block, provided that all the new uses and definitions can be performed at the new location. The way to do this is:

change.move_range = insn->ebb ()->insn_range ();

In either case, the next step is to make sure that move range is consistent with the new uses and definitions. The way to do this is:

if (!rtl_ssa::restrict_movement (change))
  return false;

This function tries to limit move_range to a range of instructions at which new_uses and new_defs can be correctly performed. It returns true on success or false if no suitable location exists.

The pass should also tentatively change the pattern of the instruction to whatever form the pass wants the instruction to have. This should use the facilities provided by recog.cc. For example:

rtl_insn *rtl = insn->rtl ();
insn_change_watermark watermark;
validate_change (rtl, &PATTERN (rtl), new_pat, 1);

will tentatively replace insn’s pattern with new_pat.

These changes and the construction of the rtl_ssa::insn_change can happen in either order or be interleaved.

After the tentative changes to the instruction are complete, the pass should check whether the new pattern matches a target instruction or satisfies the requirements of an inline asm:

if (!rtl_ssa::recog (attempt, change))
  return false;

This step might change the instruction pattern further in order to make it match. It might also add new definitions or restrict the range of the move. For example, if the new pattern did not match in its original form, but could be made to match by adding a clobber of the flags register, rtl_ssa::recog will check whether the flags register is free at an appropriate point. If so, it will add a clobber of the flags register to new_defs and restrict move_range to the locations at which the flags register can be safely clobbered.

Even if the proposed new instruction is valid according to rtl_ssa::recog, the change might not be worthwhile. For example, when optimizing for speed, the new instruction might turn out to be slower than the original one. When optimizing for size, the new instruction might turn out to be bigger than the original one.

Passes should check for this case using change_is_worthwhile. For example:

if (!rtl_ssa::change_is_worthwhile (change))
  return false;

If the change passes this test too then the pass can perform the change using:

confirm_change_group ();
crtl->ssa->change_insn (change);

Putting all this together, the change has the following form:

auto attempt = crtl->ssa->new_change_attempt ();

rtl_ssa::insn_change change (insn);
change.new_defs = …;
change.new_uses = …;
change.move_range = …;

if (!rtl_ssa::restrict_movement (change))
  return false;

insn_change_watermark watermark;
// Use validate_change etc. to change INSN's pattern.
…
if (!rtl_ssa::recog (attempt, change)
    || !rtl_ssa::change_is_worthwhile (change))
  return false;

confirm_change_group ();
crtl->ssa->change_insn (change);