This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
An array of an unknown bound is an incomplete type, so no object of such a type can be constructed. This means __is_constructible should always be false for an array of unknown bound. This patch also changes the std::is_default_constructible trait to use std::is_constructible, which now gives the right answer for arrays of unknown bound. gcc/cp: PR c++/90532 Ensure __is_constructible(T[]) is false * method.c (is_xible_helper): Return error_mark_node for construction of an array of unknown bound. gcc/testsuite: PR c++/90532 Ensure __is_constructible(T[]) is false * g++.dg/ext/90532.C: New test. libstdc++-v3: PR c++/90532 Ensure __is_constructible(T[]) is false * include/std/type_traits (__do_is_default_constructible_impl) (__is_default_constructible_atom, __is_default_constructible_safe): Remove. (is_default_constructible): Use is_constructible. * testsuite/20_util/is_constructible/value.cc: Check int[] case. * testsuite/20_util/is_default_constructible/value.cc: Likewise. * testsuite/20_util/is_trivially_constructible/value.cc: Likewise. * testsuite/20_util/is_trivially_default_constructible/value.cc: Likewise. Tested powerpc64le-linux. Is the G++ change OK for trunk? This fixes a regression on gcc-9-branch and gcc-8-branch, because changing std::is_constructible to use __is_constructible caused it to start giving the wrong answer for arrays of unknown bound. OK for the branches too, after appropriate testing?
Attachment:
patch.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |