This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Improve API docs for <memory> and <new>

From: Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 14:02:11 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve API docs for <memory> and <new>
References: <20190507153048.GA5102@redhat.com> <20190507224818.GZ2599@redhat.com> <20190507224848.GA2599@redhat.com> <20190507232231.GB2599@redhat.com> <20190510214110.GG2599@redhat.com>

Hi Jonathan,

On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 23:41, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> More Doxygenation.
>
> Tested powerpc64le-linux. Committed to trunk.
>
>

You've probably noticed by now, but this introduced a regression (!):
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/Wattributes1.C  -std=c++14  (test for warnings, line 125)

This is because you added a line to libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new and the
warning now appears at line 126....

I can certainly patch the test and replace 125 with 126 in it, I'm
just not sure want to keep this fragile dependency?

Christophe

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Improve API docs for <memory> and <new>
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- [PATCH] Improve API docs for std::regex
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- [PATCH] Improve API docs for <chrono> and <ratio>
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- [PATCH] Improve API docs for std::pair
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- [PATCH] Improve API docs Filesystem TS and Networking TS
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- [PATCH] Improve API docs for <memory> and <new>
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]