This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PR libstdc++/84654 Do not use __float128 if it is disabled by the compiler


On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 08:10:03PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 03:47:19PM -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
> > In order to use the __float128 in C++ it's necessary to check if
> > it is supported in libstdc++ (i.e. via _GLIBCXX_USE_FLOAT128) and if the
> > compiler enabled its support too, e.g. -mfloat128 or -mno-float128.
> > 
> > 2018-03-01 Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Two spaces between date and name and name and email address.
> 
> > 	PR libstdc++/84654
> > 	* include/bits/std_abs.h: Avoid to use __float128 when the
> > 	compiler disabled it.
> > 	* include/std/type_traits: Likewise.
> 
> That is incorrect.  Only powerpc* defines __FLOAT128__ macro, but it isn't
> the only one with __float128 type, e.g. x86_64-linux provides __float128
> too, but doesn't define __FLOAT128__.
> 
> On x86_64-linux one can check for defined(__SIZEOF_FLOAT128__) instead.
> 
> One could argue that what powerpc does is wrong, defining __SIZEOF_*__ is
> consistent with all the other __SIZEOF_*__ macros.
> 
> Also (up to libstdc++ maintainers) I'd say that _GLIBCXX_USE_FLOAT128
> macro should depend on this macro, rather than uglifying all the uses.
> So, #undef somewhere _GLIBCXX_USE_FLOAT128 if __SIZEOF_FLOAT128__ is
> not defined.

Note ia64, pa and powerpcspe likely need to be fixed too to predefine
__SIZEOF_FLOAT128__=16 if they provide __float128.

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]