This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Papers comparing SSO and COW strings
- From: Alexey Salmin <alexey dot salmin at gmail dot com>
- To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 19:44:55 +0300
- Subject: Re: Papers comparing SSO and COW strings
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAKt1OCRQeqr_bxu=DTMRqoOVZ3ef1eU2dQ2ejqohp_aXYrvG+A@mail.gmail.com> <20170515154610.GI5109@redhat.com>
True, and I've done some limited local runs on that matter. Though
there's a long way from experiments to published research results and
I hope someone had gone through that already. If not, then probably I
will.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 15/05/17 17:32 +0300, Alexey Salmin wrote:
>>
>> I'm looking for papers and articles that cover these topics. Anything
>> from a documented and analyzed speed-up of a given application with
>> GCC 5.1 to a comprehensive research. Regarding the hardware I'm
>> primarily interested in x86_64 but data on other architectures would
>> be also useful.
>
>
> Since GCC 5+ supports both string types you can fairly easily compare
> the two using exactly the same compiler, same optimisations etc. if
> you're interested in doing so.
>
>