Re: [PATCH C++] - SD-6 Implementation Part 3 - .

[Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>]

On 01/09/14 21:46 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> Index: testsuite/experimental/feat-lib-fund.cc
> ===================================================================
> --- testsuite/experimental/feat-lib-fund.cc	(revision 0)
> +++ testsuite/experimental/feat-lib-fund.cc	(working copy)
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +// { dg-options "-std=gnu++14" }
> +// { dg-do compile }
> +
> +#include <experimental/optional>
> +#include <experimental/string_view>
> +
> +#if !__has_include(<experimental/optional>)
> +#  error "<experimental/optional>"
> +#endif
> +
> +//#if !__has_include(<experimental/net>)
> +//#  error "<experimental/net>"
> +//#endif
> +
> +//#if !__has_include(<experimental/any>)
> +//#  error "<experimental/any>"
> +//#endif
> +
> +//#if !__has_include(<experimental/memory_resource>)
> +//#  error "<experimental/memory_resource>"
> +//#endif
> +
> +#if !__has_include(<experimental/string_view>)
> +#  error "<experimental/string_view>"
> +#endif

Hi Ed,

I'm about to commit std::experimental::apply() from the Library
Fundamentals TS and so wanted to add <experimental/tuple> to your new
feat-lib-fund.cc test.

Should that test be actually including all the files (as it does for
optional and string_view) or just test for their presence?

Should the other headers added by the TS be there as well (commented
out for now)? If so it's missing utility, type_traits, ratio, chrono,
system_error, functional, memory, future and algorithm.

Of course, while the files are missing and the tests for the mare
commented out the test can't fail and so only really serves as a
reminder/placeholder for what's missing.