This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Four times faster printf %e for num_put
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Povilas Kanapickas <povilas at radix dot lt>
- Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:49:03 +0000
- Subject: Re: Four times faster printf %e for num_put
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52CB3224 dot 6030008 at radix dot lt> <52D20233 dot 10000 at radix dot lt> <36467626-1DF4-4385-974F-8BA7EC46EFCA at oracle dot com> <CAH6eHdSeO=Fp1OW4pHZomG0YpdSPBVYTQ-LQ2MPc=pjcgp3-Qw at mail dot gmail dot com> <52D62B9D dot 3020507 at radix dot lt>
On 15 January 2014 06:33, Povilas Kanapickas wrote:
>
> As of now, it's not clear whether the design makes sense to the
> maintainers at all. Without some kind of 'go ahead' feedback, I'm a bit
> reluctant to put further work into it. Legal prerequisites are under way
> though.
Understood. In principle I think it's a good idea and would not be
opposed to something like that in libstdc++ (I'd certainly like to see
num_put be faster than printf!) but even as a proof-of-concept I don't
want to review the code without a copyright assignment in place,
certainly not during Stage 3 when we're busy chasing bugs :-)