This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] Fix libstdc++/54577

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 02:25:47 +0200
Subject: Re: [v3] Fix libstdc++/54577
References: <518D0177 dot 8090709 at oracle dot com> <CAH6eHdSBuGQRuAVZ98SzGGuqTv7EbhDsrNmP3cHgZy_RJhbgpQ at mail dot gmail dot com>

On 05/19/2013 02:09 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

On 10 May 2013 15:17, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Hi,

this is the issue about the signatures of the erase member functions of the
sequence containers.

This only does the erase() functions, is there any reason not to do
the same for the insert() functions too, which was also changed by
N2350?

I can't imagine any reason, no. Apparently people wanted erase first andwe also had a Bugzilla, thus I found the time to do those. Surely sooneror later we have to fix all the signatures.


Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] Fix libstdc++/54577
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- [v3] Fix libstdc++/54577
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] Fix libstdc++/54577
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]