This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: multi-variate distribution

From: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>
Cc: Daniel Krügler <daniel dot kruegler at gmail dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 07:42:47 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: multi-variate distribution
References: <CAOPLpQem9uFt15ZGHtN4Xzazym+zNd20QBMBBy8+fYkueC0QBA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGNvRgCezdfzYU2WvQgapHpAQXoBzzY=-C2C7vQ2BZS2Bbpakw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOPLpQfpt01TkH1aQC+VN730yQ1bssLorQemc2SDv5FgS3CxAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOPLpQfOBwkY0t_Vjo9HkeH21U7_TLG3ZsFdMjqaYhUQ6Cg39A@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org

On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree with these points and changed the code.  The overall question
stands, are these the best interfaces for the job?
No comments?

Most libstdc++ maintainers are away this week...

One question: in operator(), you are not using the __generate member function of normal_distribution. Is there a reason it can't be used?

--
Marc Glisse

Follow-Ups:
- Re: multi-variate distribution
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

References:
- multi-variate distribution
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: multi-variate distribution
  - From: Daniel Krügler
- Re: multi-variate distribution
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: multi-variate distribution
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]