This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 24 June 2012 04:57, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:They certainly could be. I was just following the style of the existing implementation. The old string ctors were outline.(CC'ing gcc-patches)Here is a beginning patch to add const char* constructors for the standard exception classes.
I didn't bump the so version because I'm not positive how to do it. I tried changing libtool_VERSION in acinclude.m4 and running the autotools commands. The diffs were very messy because my machine has autotools 1.11.3 rather than 1.11.1. Also, we might want to wait for something cooler to bump the soname.
Could those new constructors be inline, avoiding the need for a new file and version bump?
Attachment:
patch_cstring_stdexcept_ctors_3
Description: Text document
Attachment:
CL_cstring_stdexcept_ctors_3
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |