On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
I assume this is a size_t vs int type problem, but the diagnostic
points to the function declaration, not to an actual binary
expression, and I can't figure out what it's complaining about:
My mailer uses proportional fonts so I can't make sense of the
diagnostics with the carets :-/
Note: my current patchset is:
Index: libstdc++-v3/include/std/bitset
===================================================================
--- libstdc++-v3/include/std/bitset ? ? (revision 186562)
+++ libstdc++-v3/include/std/bitset ? ? (working copy)
@@ -1374,13 +1374,13 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
? ? ? void
? ? ? bitset<_Nb>::
? ? ? _M_copy_from_ptr(const _CharT* __s, size_t __len,
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? size_t __pos, size_t __n, _CharT __zero, _CharT __one)
? ? ? {
? ? ? ?reset();
- ? ? ? const size_t __nbits = std::min(_Nb, std::min(__n, __len - __pos));
+ ? ? ? const size_t __nbits = std::min(_Nb, std::min(__n, (size_t)(__len - __pos)));
style nits: It should be size_t(__len - __pos), and not (size_t)(__len - __pos).
Same for the other hunk. ?Patch OK with those changes.