This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3] libstdc++/51558
On 12/15/2011 12:49 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Sorry for not thinking of it sooner, but it occurs to me now that
"std::hash is not specialized for this type" might be better than
"std::hash must be specialized for this type", because it isn't true
that it *must* be specialized, users have the option of providing
their own alternative hash function instead of specializing std::hash
(as you've done in the testsuite with X_hash)
Indeed, very good point, I'll change that.
Paolo.