This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <richard dot earnshaw at arm dot com>, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at arm dot com>, Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, Douglas Rupp <rupp at gnat dot com>, Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>, Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>, Kaz Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org>, David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Sterling Augustine <augustine dot sterling at gmail dot com>, Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Nicola Pero <nicola dot pero at meta-innovation dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:43:21 +0200
Subject: Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)
References: <ydd1ux2oc1u.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

On 08/03/2011 03:32 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:

It should incorporate all review comments and a few errors I've noticed
during final review have been corrected.

I've received approval for the Darwin bits, Steve successfully tested on
HP-UX/IA64 and Linux/IA64 at least bootstrapped.  VMS/IA64 approval has
been given conditional on the approval of the other IA64 bits.  I've
also received approval for the libjava parts.

Bootstrapped without regressions (together with the next two, to be
resubmitted shortly: fp-bit and soft-fp moves) on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

i386-pc-solaris2.10, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, alpha-dec-osf5.1b,
mips-sgi-irix6.5 and i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 bootstraps in progress.
powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0 currently broken (SIGBUS compiling
c-family/c-pretty-print.c and cp/call.c).

How should we proceed with this patch, especially given the quite
moderate comments from most affected target maintainers?

ARM is the only target we should care a bit about. Any chance you can try cross-compiling it (with a combined tree it should not be hard)? Just to see that it builds.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)
  - From: Rainer Orth

References:
- [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)
  - From: Rainer Orth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]