Re: [v3] constexpr array additions

[François Dumont <francois dot cppdevs at free dot fr>]

On 07/26/2011 06:24 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> > I'll do that today, and put in a marker for this issue in the
> > testsuite.
> Like so.
>
> -benjamin

	Sorry to react so late, I forgot to send this mail several days.

    I think the -fno-exceptions should be removed from the test 
dg-options. Otherwise your comment saying that the 'at' should throw or 
abort is wrong. I think the testsuite logic is to write neutral tests 
and challenge them with numerous different combination of options. I 
guess the testsuite is run with -fno-exceptions option before a release, 
no ?

    Moreover you are testing the mutable at method, not the const one 
involved in the patch, we should have a second test case.

François