This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 00:07:06 +0000
- Subject: Re: [doc,patch] Move from GFDL 1.2 to GFDL 1.3
- References: <alpine.LSU.1.99.1006052321310.436@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1006052251280.32666@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.LSU.1.99.1006062353320.436@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <AANLkTin7onzF7kib55oKALk6RM-D1_ZrjwmgXf7b3nDF@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTilqBgknodElBSKQC0bIbneLwcaC3Mt1X79tSdQu@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.1.99.1006070134530.436@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <AANLkTinBPNq4Rm-shP8wIXx3v_BhwFD5Pyo3wnPNOfXH@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.1.99.1006140002180.23468@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <AANLkTimqZ6DsVuPPFCGK9BvcXIdyLtQIm-UIw5fhovcP@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1102070056290.8943@gerinyyl>
On 6 February 2011 23:57, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>>> And wouldn't it be appropriate to remove doc/xml/gnu/fdl-1.2.xml now
>>>>> that you have added fdl-1.3.xml?
>>>> Possibly. We still have gpl-2.0.xml there, which doesn't seem to be
>>>> included. ?I followed that example.
>>>
>>> If you are not using GPL 2.0 nor FDL 1.2 anymore in libstdc++ (and we
>>> should not be using these two anymore in all of GCC), we should remove
>>> them. ?Would you mind doing that or should I give it a try?
>> I can do that, assuming no objections from the other maintainers.
>
> Hmm, I see that these two are still in there. ?We should not be
> using them anymore. ?Would you mind removing them, or do you see
> a problem?
>
> (It would be good to make the same change for GCC 4.5 as well.)
Ah sorry, I think I forgot about it, I'll do it tomorrow.