This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [patch/libstdc++-v3] export long double versions of "C" math library on more platforms
- From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- To: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Aurelien Jarno <aurel32 at debian dot org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:03:04 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch/libstdc++-v3] export long double versions of "C" math library on more platforms
- References: <4C13689C.5090608@ubuntu.com>
On 06/12/2010 12:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> When libstdc++-v3 is built on a system running glibc-2.11 or newer, a
> libstdc++.so.6 is built not exporting anymore the long double versions
> of "C" math library. For hppa-linux this is already taken care of.
> The missing symbols were observed on arm-linux-gnueabi and
> mips*-linux-gnu builds. Joseph S. Myers mentioned on #gcc that more
> platforms which did export these in the past should export these as
> well. It's not clear if the old ARM ABI should export these as well.
> If the patch is accepted, it should go to the active branches as well.
Thus, do I understand correctly that Joseph is OK with the arm bits of
your patch? Which kind of practical evidence do we have about m68k,
mips, and sh? At least, I would ask the maintainers to have a look...
can you do that?
Thanks,
Paolo.