This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] Remove uses of <cstddef> as an implementation detail

From: Gennaro Prota <gennaro dot prota at yahoo dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:54:21 +0200
Subject: Re: [v3] Remove uses of <cstddef> as an implementation detail
References: <4C080053.9010907@oracle.com>

On 03/06/2010 21.19, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Hi,

this, largely boring patch essentially does what the Subject says, thus
following the spirit of LWG 1250, avoiding uses of C-style NULLs,
trimming the size of the C++ headers. I took also the occasion to add
std::nullptr_t, in C++0x mode.

Hi all,

I'm just turning up in these parts so my apologies if this has
been discussed and decided upon earlier, but why would one want
such a modification? Just to save on the amount of parsed code?

-- Gennaro Prota | name.surname yahoo.com Breeze C++ (preview): <https://sourceforge.net/projects/breeze/> Do you need expertise in C++? I'm available. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] Remove uses of <cstddef> as an implementation detail
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [v3] Remove uses of <cstddef> as an implementation detail
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]