This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
[C++-0x] Status of constexpr
- From: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
- To: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:41:04 -0500
- Subject: [C++-0x] Status of constexpr
I have a patch in my tree that employs the constexpr keyword in most of
the places in the library where it is required in n3000. This patch
bootstraps and causes no new regressions on MacOS at least. I still
need test cases.
My question is this: Is constexpr in good enough shape to put this in?
Some message seemed to suggest it wasn't finished yet.