This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3] More of condition_variable_any
On 2 February 2010 23:12, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> I'm thinking, in general: if the lay programmer had ?to qualify
> everything with this-> when writing simple classes (no templates, bases,
> anything) I would come to the conclusion that there is something really
> broken in the lookup rules (well beyond the known brokeness of ADL, I
> mean ;)
Well, they are member function templates, which is why I managed to
confuse myself :)
But it's still not a problem. Thanks for picking it up.