Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
let's templatize that constructor and that seed member, which indeed are
templates in the draft Walter Brown is working on. The constraining
should be good enough, we can tweak it later, when the iter of the
de-conceptified specs proceeds. Tested x86_64-linux, committed to
mainline.
Paolo.
/////////////////
Heh, I was just about to send out this patch for this very thing ;-)
These should have been templates even in concept I think.
Ignore the patch I guess.
The patch I had was for what I thought were defects. Besides the
template Sseq ctors and seeds I think that shuffle_order_engine should
compare not just the engine but also the saves engine executions that
are . The requirement is that a sequence of invocations of the
shuffle_order_engine should return the same results. This requires
equality of the rest of the state I think.