This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: RFA: Avoid simulator timeouts on more libstdc++ tests
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Mark Mitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Paolo Carlini wrote:
> More generally, I actually think "simulator" is the wrong predicate. ?It
> should be "slow target" (which doesn't exist as a predicate at present);
> "simulator" is just a special case of that. ?A little microcontroller
> might well have the same problem. ?We could honor a setting in the
> DejaGNU board file, falling back to "simulator" if the board didn't
> explicitly set the flag.