This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org?

From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: "Gerald Pfeifer" <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:47:46 +0200
Subject: Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org?
References: <alpine.LSU.1.10.0807201023270.8835@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0807201645390.10349@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <84fc9c000807201355n327d6172xb7523e563cf7476@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0807210003150.11088@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Kaveh R. GHAZI <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> > The mailing list webpage still refers to CVS:
>> > http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html
>> >
>> > Can we rename these lists (perhaps preserving an alias for the old names)
>> > so that they reflect reality?
>>
>> I don't see a reason to rename the list.
>> Richard.
>
> We don't use cvs, so "gcc-cvs@..." is misleading.

Who cares?

Richard.

References:
- Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org?
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org?
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org?
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]