This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [c++0x] unique_ptr
- From: rodolfo at rodsoft dot org
- To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- Cc: Chris Fairles <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:13:46 -0300
- Subject: Re: [c++0x] unique_ptr
- References: <19410834.1211377835791.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt301.oracle.com> <g11b1e$fmc$1@ger.gmane.org> <1264017.1211380155425.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt301.oracle.com> <g11dbu$ova$1@ger.gmane.org> <17357752.1211382786120.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt301.oracle.com> <g11gmc$67l$1@ger.gmane.org> <27415119.1211385856582.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt301.oracle.com> <15311122.1211387272514.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt301.oracle.com> <fac6bb500805220424r2286f00eo26064d8087fdd10d@mail.gmail.com> <484D3AD3.1050708@oracle.com>
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:14:43PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Any news about unique_ptr?
The LWG is deciding whether unique_ptr will require a complete type or not
(as with shared_ptr). Since it's a big change in implementation, IMHO it's
better to wait for a final decision on this matter. If I'm not mistaken,
the sophia antipolis meeting is happening during this week, so we can
expect some news on this subject shortly.
Reference:
http://home.twcny.rr.com/hinnant/cpp_extensions/issues_preview/lwg-active.html#762
Regards,
Rodolfo Lima