This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ needs a bit of help
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 18:46:38 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ needs a bit of help
- References: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0803231712350.22304@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20080324100953.4164f3aa@wabash.artheist.org> <alpine.LSU.1.00.0804070204520.22304@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20080409165912.2390d5c8@wabash.artheist.org> <alpine.LSU.1.00.0804130110340.1558@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20080418112658.3b2bf263@wabash.artheist.org>
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>> libstdc++-html.20080213 drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 258048 Mar 26
>> 06:05 libstdc++-html.20080326 drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 237568 Jan
>> 18 06:49 libstdc++-html-USERS-20080118
>
> These are just the latest doxygen files, ie things that
> the "latest-doxgen" symlink finds.
>
> We really only need what's current (ie, 20080326). (I was keeping some
> of the older ones around because sometimes output changes depending on
> doxygen version, and I wanted a quick way to check. However, the
> 20080328 version is correct.)
I see a new version now. Will it be okay to remove
drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 114688 Feb 13 21:39 libstdc++-html.20080213
drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 258048 Mar 26 06:05 libstdc++-html.20080326
and
drwxr-sr-x 2 bkoz gcc 237568 Jan 18 06:49 libstdc++-html-USERS-20080118
Do you see any chance to integrate the building of this documentation
into the generation of the regular release-specific documentation and
perhaps have the documents under those subdirectories instead of having
this under libstdc++? That would make things more consistent, but I do
not know how hard this will be.
Gerald