This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, v3] PR 35954: rebuild of precompiled headers

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:59:33 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v3] PR 35954: rebuild of precompiled headers
References: <20080418052130.GA31488@ins.uni-bonn.de> <20080418104652.062b37f4@wabash.artheist.org> <20080418115624.46a26ce9@wabash.artheist.org> <20080418052130.GA31488@ins.uni-bonn.de> <20080418104652.062b37f4@wabash.artheist.org> <20080418052130.GA31488@ins.uni-bonn.de> <48087A23.4070706@gnu.org> <20080418200841.GA2227@ins.uni-bonn.de>

Should I still use $(LN_S) -f?
Ignoring return value and 2>/dev/null seems safer.

Yes. At least in this case where we know that the destination of the symbolic link won't change.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, v3] PR 35954: rebuild of precompiled headers
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues

References:
- [PATCH, v3] PR 35954: rebuild of precompiled headers
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- Re: [PATCH, v3] PR 35954: rebuild of precompiled headers
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [PATCH, v3] PR 35954: rebuild of precompiled headers
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [PATCH, v3] PR 35954: rebuild of precompiled headers
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH, v3] PR 35954: rebuild of precompiled headers
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]