This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Nested std::tr1::bind problem

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Douglas Gregor <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:40:23 +0100
Subject: Re: Nested std::tr1::bind problem
References: <frb94q$8bp$1@ger.gmane.org> <016401c88510$e18f8770$6407a80a@pdimov2> <frbel8$1ja$1@ger.gmane.org> <47D962F7.3060406@suse.de> <D606E3FD-B6D1-44E3-A870-D9CD28662A86@osl.iu.edu>

Douglas Gregor wrote:
> We're actually allowed to use rvalue references in TR1... but
> obviously we can only do so in C++0x mode.
I disagree. I don't think it makes sense, now, to rework TR1 facilities
to use rvalue references. which did not exist in TR1, for one. Also,
from the point of view of v3 maintainance, my (strong) opinion is that
TR1 facilities should be only minimally maintained now, basically fixing
regressions and serious bugs, nothing more sophisticated.

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Nested std::tr1::bind problem
  - From: Peter Dimov

References:
- Nested std::tr1::bind problem
  - From: Rodolfo Lima
- Re: Nested std::tr1::bind problem
  - From: Peter Dimov
- Re: Nested std::tr1::bind problem
  - From: Rodolfo Schulz de Lima
- Re: Nested std::tr1::bind problem
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Nested std::tr1::bind problem
  - From: Douglas Gregor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]