This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [c++0x] <date_time> implementation, take 4

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: Pedro LamarÃo <pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:09:58 -0500
Subject: Re: [c++0x] <date_time> implementation, take 4
References: <47D7331C.2050004@mndfck.org> <47D79439.8000902@suse.de> <47D7C937.8000503@mndfck.org> <47D83038.8060906@suse.de>

> I'am afraid you are stumbling in the tricky situation above: some new 
> symbols are inadvertently matching old patterns in the linker
> script... 

Right.

When this happens, you'll see new incompatible sybols added, that have
version labels "GLIBCXX_3.4."

You want new symbols to end up in GLIBCXX_3.4.11 at this point.

best,
benjamin

References:
- [c++0x] <date_time> implementation, take 4
  - From: Pedro LamarÃo
- Re: [c++0x] <date_time> implementation, take 4
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [c++0x] <date_time> implementation, take 4
  - From: Pedro LamarÃo
- Re: [c++0x] <date_time> implementation, take 4
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]