This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Testing parallel mode and PR34106
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: "Jonathan Wakely" <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:54:23 -0600
- Subject: Re: Testing parallel mode and PR34106
- References: <4348dea50712110602n53e802d6nea5ddf4992812ea8@mail.gmail.com>
> Should I be able to run "make check-parallel" with no FAILs? Even
> before I touched any parallel headers I'm seeing several failures.
There are currently 10 fails in parallel mode. You're not going crazy.
;)
Here are the fails:
FAIL: 23_containers/headers/bitset/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/headers/deque/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/headers/list/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/headers/map/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/headers/set/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/headers/vector/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 25_algorithms/partial_sort/moveable.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 25_algorithms/sort/vectorbool.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-5.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-7.cc execution test
Of these, the ones that say "synopsis" are not actually failures, as
these test cases test behavior prohibited by the standard (Redeclaring
std items.) I should probably mark these up, indicating this.
I haven't had a chance to look much into the other issue, WRT atomics.
Sorry.
benjamin