This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [Patch / Request For Testers] libstdc++/34032
- From: Eric Niebler <eric dot niebler at gmail dot com>
- To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
- Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:40:10 -0800
- Subject: Re: [Patch / Request For Testers] libstdc++/34032
- References: <4733A8E2.9040906@suse.de> <473460D9.4000006@suse.de>
Paolo Carlini wrote:
Paolo Carlini wrote:
It would be nice if Eric could double check and possibly other test on,
eg, darwin, which normally enables as many C99 facilities as gnu-linux.
In the meanwhile I have been able to double check that
powerpc-darwin8.10 is also Ok.
I can confirm that that patch fixes the problem with <iostream> and
::isblank. Of course, it means that some standard C++0x functions are
not available under -std=c++0x even though they are implemented on
cygwin, but I don't think there is much gcc can do about that. Someone
needs to fix cygwin's C headers.
Thanks,
Eric