This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] annex D 8 and 9 for C++0x

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:54:31 -0500
Subject: Re: [v3] annex D 8 and 9 for C++0x
References: <9f71cef00710260925s2a1c8662n570849103f709695@mail.gmail.com> <871wbh910k.fsf@soliton.cs.tamu.edu>

> Do we really need to warn about auto_ptr<>?

Is it in Annex D in C++0x? If so, then yes. Why would it be treated
differently than anything else?

I have provided a consistent, complete transition to C++0x. It
may be uncomfortable for some, but it is accurate and provides the most value to libstdc++ users and developers now and
in the future, and quite frankly in the most timely manner possible. 

I will do the testsuite additions and update the libstdc++
documentation with the explanatory bits from my original message as a
follow-on patch.

-benjamin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] annex D 8 and 9 for C++0x
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [v3] annex D 8 and 9 for C++0x
  - From: Peter Dimov

References:
- [v3] annex D 8 and 9 for C++0x
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] annex D 8 and 9 for C++0x
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]