This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Make sure symbol version script is writeable
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jim Blandy <jimb at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:07:00 -0600
- Subject: Re: Make sure symbol version script is writeable
- References: <m364741gqm.fsf@codesourcery.com> <jetzuonuix.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <m31whsp1r1.fsf@codesourcery.com>
Jim Blandy wrote:
> Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
>> Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com> writes:
>>
>>> If the source tree has been made read-only, the libstdc++-v3 build
>>> dies trying to construct src/libstdc++-symbols.ver.
>>>
>>> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>>> 2007-05-07 Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
>>>
>>> * libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am (libstdc++-symbol.ver): Make
>>> sure the build tree copy of libstdc++-symbol.ver is writeable.
>>> * libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.in: Regenerated.
>>>
>>> Index: libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am (revision 124502)
>>> +++ libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am (working copy)
>>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>>> libstdc++-symbols.ver: ${glibcxx_srcdir}/$(SYMVER_FILE) \
>>> $(port_specific_symbol_files)
>>> cp ${glibcxx_srcdir}/$(SYMVER_FILE) ./libstdc++-symbols.ver
>>> + chmod +w ./libstdc++-symbol.ver
>> You surely mean `symbols' here?
>
> Yes, I certainly do. Thanks for the close reading. (This is what I
> get for working with three branches at once, none of whose patches
> apply cleanly to the others.)
It doesn't look like this patch was ever applied. With the change
Andreas has suggested, this is OK after the lockdown.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713