This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: EH patch for libstdc++

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at buzzard dot freeserve dot co dot uk>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:00:14 -0700
Subject: Re: EH patch for libstdc++
References: <4668E6BE.1080004@codesourcery.com> <20070608102735.57ac9304@concorde.artheist.org> <1181475203.19526.13.camel@merlin> <1181688487.19526.21.camel@merlin>

Richard Earnshaw wrote:

>> Except that your more minimal version doesn't even compile, for the same
>> reasons that Jason's original patch doesn't compile.

> So how do we proceed on this?  I'm taking your counter proposal (even
> though it doesn't work) as a rejection of my proposed patch.
> 
> I'd like to reach closure on this ASAP, building C++ for arm-eabi has
> been broken for over a month now.

I agree.  It's disappointing that this patch wasn't reviewed much more
quickly in the first place, and we should certainly get it moved forward
now.

I still think your original patch should go in.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

Follow-Ups:
- Re: EH patch for libstdc++
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

References:
- EH patch for libstdc++
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: EH patch for libstdc++
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: EH patch for libstdc++
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: EH patch for libstdc++
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]