This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: backwards headers vs. C++0x
- From: "Jonathan Wakely" <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 02:08:13 +0100
- Subject: Re: backwards headers vs. C++0x
- References: <9f71cef00703030853n59da180aq4d93f1dde55da180@mail.gmail.com> <45E9B5C3.1080602@suse.de> <1172945289.4743.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45E9BD3E.9080706@suse.de> <1172946528.4743.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45EB0A67.9010409@codesourcery.com> <20070305170320.GB7387@synopsys.com> <45ED6BA0.5010305@redhat.com> <m3slchft1x.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
On 06 Mar 2007 22:48:10 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
Here is a start at that:
-Wno-deprecated used in configure.ac files:
http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22-Wno-deprecated%22+file%3Aconfigure.ac&btnG=Search
-Wno-deprecated used in Makefile:
http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22-Wno-deprecated%22+file%3AMake&btnG=Search
It's hard to know if -Wno-deprecated was used to silence warnings from
<strstream> (deprecated, but still in the standard) or one of the
non-standard headers such as <iostream.h>, since they all give the
same warning.
Jon