This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:55:06 -0700
Subject: Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage
References: <20070327220453.GA4342@redhat.com> <46099F40.4060409@suse.de> <20070327232910.GB3360@redhat.com> <4609AB4A.6040206@suse.de>

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:39:54AM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Seriously, I'm thinking that, in any case, considering only unsigned 
> long and something bigger - unsigned long long - we cannot regress, 
> right?

Probably not.  I'll leave this up to you then.



r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- [libstdc++]
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [libstdc++]
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]