This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: backwards headers vs. C++0x

From: Douglas Gregor <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>
To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 13:08:09 -0500
Subject: Re: backwards headers vs. C++0x
References: <9f71cef00703030853n59da180aq4d93f1dde55da180@mail.gmail.com> <45E9B5C3.1080602@suse.de>
Reply-to: dgregor at osl dot iu dot edu

On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 18:52 +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> I don't think someone is seriously suggesting to 
> have iostream.h in C++0x!

Howard would know for sure, but I don't recall that anyone has proposed
*to the C++ committee* that those deprecated headers be removed. I'm all
for removing these deprecated headers from libstdc++-v3 and from C++0x,
but we need to make sure they're actually being removed from C++0x.

  Cheers,
  Doug

Follow-Ups:
- Re: backwards headers vs. C++0x
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- backwards headers vs. C++0x
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: backwards headers vs. C++0x
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]