Re: [v3] c++0x includes

[Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple dot com>]

On Feb 21, 2007, at 7:23 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

> The specifications for TR1 include specifications for what <tgmath.h>
> and <complex.h> are. In particular, they seem to specify content that
> is much different than the "C" or "C99" includes.

Just as a clarification (or complication ;-)) the TR1 complex.h will  
most likely be a little different than the C++0X complex.h.  The TR1  
complex.h has:


> and provides sufficient using declarations to declare in the
> global namespace all function and type names declared or defined in  
> the neader <complex>.

However:

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#551

is currently set to remove that clause.  I glanced through the patch  
and I believe you have the C++0X definition of complex.h (which is  
what I recommend).

I also glanced at tgmath.h.  I could be mistaken but it doesn't look  
right to me in the patch.  It should be:

#include <complex.h> // or <ccomplex>
#include <math.h>

It currently looks like it includes <cmath> instead of <math.h>.

-Howard